Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T21:46:52.214Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:39:09.362Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: f6170c1ddafc33986c776a9c9563220ce26360fb01fe60ae9604564982313c67
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms
{P, P -> Q, Q -> R} |= P <-> (Q <-> R)
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
Life and Death by Maclain Hunter
Premises:
P: Knowledge of death can only persist and be held in a given context if life exists to know it. Assume that something could be conscious of death without consciousness and life in that sense of consciousness and agency. This leads to paradox and the violation of the Law of Non-Contradiction.
Q: Given P and the nature of death being a known phenomenon only in the context of some life living on to know it (and thus life in general living on and being undefeated by death), the known existence or occurrence of death (or “finite morality”) is logical proof of life and the continuity of life as a general concept (ie - logical dynamics in the Cosmos and the autonomous beings arisen from these dynamics and logical structure).
R: Given P & Q and the nature of death being something that applies to an existing identity (prior) not something that applies first to nothingness before any existing identity, I demonstrate death as contingent upon superseding life. One implication of this is that death cannot destroy life without destroying itself. This paved the way to reasoning that life is eternal, in general, and a necessary byproduct or aspect of logical dynamics in the Logical Structure of Reality (Logos - the Universe’s Logic)
Formal Reasoning:
{P, P -> Q, Q -> R} |= P <-> (Q <-> R)
Conclusion: {P, Q, R}: