{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Logic Mandates MCB by Maclain Hunter",
  "identifier": "hunter-logic-mandates-mcb",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Logic Mandates MCB by Maclain Hunter\n\nPremises: \n\nP: One (1) and “1 ^ n = 1”\n\nQ: Not one” (or “-1”) and “-1 ^ n = 1 or -1”\n\nR: Coherence demands that the negation of Coherence (possible and even useful in contingent reasoning) opens the door logically and mathematically to MCB (Mathematically Coherent Binary) and computation centered on Logic, Coherence, the number one and its negation (-1), as well as that value (-1) applied to itself n number of times (ie - MCB exponentiation). \n\nS: Assume the negation of the premises. Then MCB shouldn’t coherently exist as even a theory, yet it does. Therefore, we can be certain that MCB is a system of computation coherent with and mandated by Logic itself.\n\nFormal Reasoning: \n\n{P, P -> Q, Q -> R, R -> S, S -> P} |= (P & Q) & (R & S)\n\nConclusion: {P, Q, R, S}: \n\nMCB is not arbitrary but mandated by Logic (ie - the Root of Existence and Computation in Logic), as exploring the nature of Coherence, identity, individuality, unity, and the number one, as well as their negation, reveals. \n\nTruth Table Analysis: \n\nPQRS⎪P P→Q Q→R R→S S→P╞(P&Q)&(R&S)\n\nTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT \n\nQ.E.D. ",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-02T20:42:37.280Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}