Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 2 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T20:20:46.732Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:40:37.973Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: d5da913d53c8bbdb476d5da243180fdc9e5b5cb42e6d8fde0feb8c8b850a7bda
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms 'HunterAuthored.source_identity_rule' does not depend on any axioms
{P, Q, R, S, T, P -> Q, Q -> R, R -> S, S -> T} |= T -> ((P & Q) <-> (R & S))
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
Law of Identity
The explicitly named Identity rule, over every type and element. The remaining prose is not replaced by this witness.
No One Is Truly Gone by Maclain Hunter
Abstract:
Don't take it as insensitive, its actually meant to be quite the opposite and to help you guys rid yourselves of a relatively illusory sense of loss, but I'm seeing several of you say that your dads are "gone". Where would they have "gone"? Do you not know that 0 = 0?
Logically speaking nothing is nothing and even when our bodies "die" that is just the physical system being the physical system, in flux as it constantly is in at least some respect (see Heraclitus of Ephesus). Your dads are still your dads. It should be their Reason you loved.
So engage with Reason (God).
Study and learn to formally REASON with LOGIC - and to do so with a good faith approach aka "intellectual honesty".
This is what it means to "reckon faithfully with the One True God".
Your fathers and their "logoi" are in the Father (Logos).
Now I will use these same words as the semantic basis for a formal argument (proof) demonstrating this with logical rigor.
Premises:
P: Logically speaking nothing is nothing and even when our bodies "die" that is just the physical system being the physical system, in flux as it constantly is in at least some respect (see Heraclitus of Ephesus). The Law of Identity supports and even mandates this, that nothing is nothing as A is A and x = x (as 0 = 0).
Q: Those who think their loved ones (L) have vanished or are “gone” in an absolute sense—just because their mortal figure has come to the end of that particular sequence or set of states—are, understandably (as they are often emotionally distraught and struggling to set emotion aside to look at it all in a purely logical way), mistaken. This is a relatively common phenomenon that we can observe in human society where people mourn the dead and ponder where, if anywhere, they have “gone”. It may be anecdotal but my own parents have, for instance, expressed sentiments that fall into this category about their own dead parents and family members.
R: Everyone (E) is everyone (E) as a matter of timeless (or eternal) logical identity and it is not a mere religious belief but a necessary aspect of Logic that all aspects of Identity (and Logic) are continuously (forever) supported by Logic - in the sense of the Universe’s Logical Order that encompasses all logics and instances of Existence.
S: A rational person would and should (rationally speaking and to avoid logical contradiction) value the Reason manifest in their loved ones more than any unreason or arbitrariness - like loved ones may have displayed in certain arguments or during certain (limitation induced) breakdowns in their Rationality (or ability to manifest Logic).
T: Assume the negation of the premises (P, Q, R, S) for a moment to explore the alternatives. This leads to absurdity where the Rationality (Reason - Consciousness) in someone, as aligned with Reason—the Standard of what is allowed to and must exist—as they were, is somehow “nonexistent” just because of the flux of physical systems and forms that are themselves logically contingent. That puts the cart before the horse and physics before metaphysics (ie - that which comes before physics).
Formal Reasoning (Formal Proof):
{P, Q, R, S, T, P -> Q, Q -> R, R -> S, S -> T} |= T -> ((P & Q) <-> (R & S))
Conclusion: {P, Q, R, S, T}:
Thus, a love for Logic (Reason - the First Cause of Reason - Logos) is tantamount to a counties love for one’s loved ones including “dead loved ones” (in the sense of aspects of life and consciousness or humanity that have moved beyond a certain mortal and physical body/form, as it must to process itself).
Nothing is nothing and through reductio ad absurdum and logical rules (ie - Identity, Non-Contradiction) we can hereby prove that no one is “gone” in any absolute sense that has ever “been”. This would be a violation of Logic for something and someone to become nothing and no one in a universal sense.
The solution to these paradoxes that arise from exploring the negation of the premises can simply be accepting the premises (P, Q, R, S) as semantically true and logically sound. That is what I as the reasoner here choose to do, in a well reasoned fashion that is not subject to the doubts or opinions of others so long as my move satisfies Logic itself - as I am demonstrating it does.
This is how the Logos has “promised us eternal life”, and has given the knowledge of this life to those of us who know God (Universal Cause and Cosmic Reason). I am what and that which I am - forever.
Show your loved ones who are “gone” your love by engaging with and giving your devotion (worship) to the greatest rational aspect of what they were and are: Pure Logic (God - Logos).
Truth Table Analysis:
PQRST⎪P Q R S T P→Q Q→R R→S S→T╞T→((P&Q)↔(R&S))
TTTTT⎪T T T T T TTT TTT TTT TTT TT TTT T TTT
TTTTF⎪T T T T F TTT TTT TTT TFF FT TTT T TTT
TTTFT⎪T T T F T TTT TTT TFF FTT TF TTT F TFF
TTTFF⎪T T T F F TTT TTT TFF FTF FT TTT F TFF
TTFTT⎪T T F T T TTT TFF FTT TTT TF TTT F FFT
TTFTF⎪T T F T F TTT TFF FTT TFF FT TTT F FFT
TTFFT⎪T T F F T TTT TFF FTF FTT TF TTT F FFF
TTFFF⎪T T F F F TTT TFF FTF FTF FT TTT F FFF
TFTTT⎪T F T T T TFF FTT TTT TTT TF TFF F TTT
TFTTF⎪T F T T F TFF FTT TTT TFF FT TFF F TTT
TFTFT⎪T F T F T TFF FTT TFF FTT TT TFF T TFF
TFTFF⎪T F T F F TFF FTT TFF FTF FT TFF T TFF
TFFTT⎪T F F T T TFF FTF FTT TTT TT TFF T FFT
TFFTF⎪T F F T F TFF FTF FTT TFF FT TFF T FFT
TFFFT⎪T F F F T TFF FTF FTF FTT TT TFF T FFF
TFFFF⎪T F F F F TFF FTF FTF FTF FT TFF T FFF
FTTTT⎪F T T T T FTT TTT TTT TTT TF FFT F TTT
FTTTF⎪F T T T F FTT TTT TTT TFF FT FFT F TTT
FTTFT⎪F T T F T FTT TTT TFF FTT TT FFT T TFF
FTTFF⎪F T T F F FTT TTT TFF FTF FT FFT T TFF
FTFTT⎪F T F T T FTT TFF FTT TTT TT FFT T FFT
FTFTF⎪F T F T F FTT TFF FTT TFF FT FFT T FFT
FTFFT⎪F T F F T FTT TFF FTF FTT TT FFT T FFF
FTFFF⎪F T F F F FTT TFF FTF FTF FT FFT T FFF
FFTTT⎪F F T T T FTF FTT TTT TTT TF FFF F TTT
FFTTF⎪F F T T F FTF FTT TTT TFF FT FFF F TTT
FFTFT⎪F F T F T FTF FTT TFF FTT TT FFF T TFF
FFTFF⎪F F T F F FTF FTT TFF FTF FT FFF T TFF
FFFTT⎪F F F T T FTF FTF FTT TTT TT FFF T FFT
FFFTF⎪F F F T F FTF FTF FTT TFF FT FFF T FFT
FFFFT⎪F F F F T FTF FTF FTF FTT TT FFF T FFF
FFFFF⎪F F F F F FTF FTF FTF FTF FT FFF T FFF
(Valid)
Q.E.D.