{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Proper Competition by Maclain Hunter",
  "identifier": "hunter-proper-competition",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Proper Competition by Maclain Hunter: \n\nP: □: REASON - the Standard of LOGIC.\n\nQ: □: Alternative standards to REASON that DON’T cohere with LOGIC - as logical rules and the rule set of valid games/competitions MUST. \n\nProof: \n\nPQ⎪P P↔¬Q╞(P&¬Q)→¬(¬P&Q)\n\nTT⎪T TFFT  TFFT TT FTFT \nTF⎪T TTTF  TTTF TT FTFF \nFT⎪F FTFT  FFFT TF TFTT \nFF⎪F FFTF  FFTF TT TFFF \n\n(Valid)\n\nConclusion: \n\nA ruleset determining victory must be logically coherent and cannot tolerate inconsistent limitations (ie - subjective answers being considered correct over objective answers in a trivia question based contest).\n\nThis extends to unfair or less limited entrants to competition (ie - men in women’s MMA).\n\nQ.E.D. \n\nParaphrasing the Rule of Logic: \n\n“You shall not disturb the absence of annihilation and or tolerate the destruction of Creation (and Construct/Logic)” - Maclain Hunter\n\nParaphrased Rule of Logic:\n\n“Preserve the integrity of existence; do not permit the dissolution of Creation, Structure, or Logic.”\n\nA third one I could add is: \n\n“As Existence (or any part of it), do not work undermine Existence (or any part of it).”",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-02T20:20:47.766Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}