{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Search Logically and Find Logic",
  "identifier": "hunter-search-logically-find-logic",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Search Logically and Find Logic by Maclain Hunter\n\nPremises: \n\nP: The coherent and truthful goal, tautologically, in honest academics seeking the discovery of any Origin, even if it were “there is not one” (and atheism seemed by that justified and redeemed), it would be the “Coherent Truth of the Origin” \n\nQ: The Coherent Truth of the Origin is coherent with Coherence (Oneness; Logic; Reason) and Reality as Reality (or Reality’s Foundational Coherence and the A is A form Logic of Reality: the Logos).  \n\nR: As a matter of Objective Coherence being necessarily singular (ie - two or more distinct “Objective Coherence” is a contradiction and is absurdity/divergence from Coherence), the Coherent Truth about God or Origin is integrated into Coherent Truth more broadly, and makes the True Origin and coherent notions of it be (necessarily and absolutely one/coherent with) the Coherent Truth (Objective Logic matching Objective Reality; Logos; the God of Truth), ultimately.\n\nS: Truth and God cannot part ways, they are One and are what they are by Logic and as Logic. Non-contradiction and Logic hold. Rebuttals to Logos and Logic (per se) are inherently incoherent. \n\nProof: \n\n{P, P -> Q, P -> R, P -> (Q & R), (Q & R) -> S |= P -> S\n\nConclusion: P -> S: \n\nThe coherent and honest search for the Truth of God (or the Origin of the Cosmos; and defined validly and in line with tradition and scripture as such) must logically and ultimately land on Coherent Truth and Logic as (and of course fully coherent with) God/Origin, and incoherence between such concepts is tautologically incoherence (and invalidating logically as such).\n\nTruth Table Analysis: \n\nTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TT TTT   TTT TT TTT\nTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TT TTT   TTT FF TFF\nTTFT⎪T TTT TFF TF TFF   TFF TT TTT\nTTFF⎪T TTT TFF TF TFF   TFF TF TFF\nTFTT⎪T TFF TTT TF FFT   FFT TT TTT\nTFTF⎪T TFF TTT TF FFT   FFT TF TFF\nTFFT⎪T TFF TFF TF FFF   FFF TT TTT\nTFFF⎪T TFF TFF TF FFF   FFF TF TFF\nFTTT⎪F FTT FTT FT TTT   TTT TT FTT\nFTTF⎪F FTT FTT FT TTT   TTT FF FTF\nFTFT⎪F FTT FTF FT TFF   TFF TT FTT\nFTFF⎪F FTT FTF FT TFF   TFF TF FTF\nFFTT⎪F FTF FTT FT FFT   FFT TT FTT\nFFTF⎪F FTF FTT FT FFT   FFT TF FTF\nFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FT FFF   FFF TT FTT\nFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FT FFF   FFF TF FTF\n\n(Valid) \n\nQED",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-03T01:29:54.990Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}