Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T20:20:54.245Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:41:56.255Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: aee3ff5f237aec81e5f784fff7c4179daa06b0279d71944884e2f6166f196017
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms
{P, Q, R} |= (P & Q) -> R
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
The Atheist’s Truth by Maclain Hunter
Premises:
P: My Truth is Truth and encompasses Truth aligned with God (the Origin of Reality) making it subjective truth that exists in harmony with the Objective Truth (the God of Truth).
Q: The atheist’s truth is subjective truth and does not, by definition (with an “atheist”), encompass Truth aligned with God (the Origin of Reality) making it a subjective truth that exists in a state of disharmony with the Objective Truth (the God of Truth) - which holds itself as the Absolute.
R: If my Truth is my Truth as in P and your truth is the atheist’s truth as in Q then your “truth” (incoherence) isn’t my Truth (Coherence) as your “truth” fails to acknowledge the necessary alignment between First Cause (the Origin of Reality), the True God (the Real Origin), and Objective Truth (True Validity).
Logical Argument:
{P, Q, R} |= (P & Q) -> R
Conclusion: {P, Q, R}:
Your truth is not Truth (in harmony with Objective Truth) or my Truth (as a theist whose Truth is defined by the Logos: Logic as God) if your “truth” is the atheist’s truth that denies or fails to acknowledge Logic and Reason as God and Origin. My Truth is superior, logically speaking, to your “truth” (false certainty) if and when you fail to accept God and Reason as coherent/one.
Truth Table Analysis:
PQR⎪P Q R╞(P&Q)→R
TTT⎪T T T TTT TT
TTF⎪T T F TTT FF
TFT⎪T F T TFF TT
TFF⎪T F F TFF TF
FTT⎪F T T FFT TT
FTF⎪F T F FFT TF
FFT⎪F F T FFF TT
FFF⎪F F F FFF TF
Q.E.D.