{"ok":true,"protocol":"maclain_hunter_q_number_item_v1","qid":"Q1068","item":{"qid":"Q1068","slug":"maclain-hunter-falseness-of-falsifiability","path":"/q/Q1068","subdomain":"q1068.4p-engine.com","schemaType":"CreativeWork","recordOrigin":"authored_source","authoredSource":{"author":"Maclain Hunter","text":"The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter:\n\nPremises: \n\nP: Assume Karl Popper’s proposed scientific principle of falsifiability is valid, and universally applicable. This leads to logical contradiction as the (alleged) principle itself is unfalsifiable by its own standard. Ergo it is a self-defeating standard that amounts to a hypocritical principle. \n\nQ: Assume that First Cause could not be falsified and thus couldn’t be scientifically true. Well this wouldn’t make the First Cause of Existence untrue, as the Standard and Origin of the very Reality that defines and decides Objective Truth, it would make human sciences and scientific principles, namely Poppers nonsensical self defeating principle requiring falsifiability, flawed and untrue - objectively. \n\nR: Assume that it is actually rational to say that for something to be true you must be able to prove it false. This leads to logical contradiction and absurdity where the most purely and universally true things, like God (Logos - First Cause - Logic - Universal Truth - Reality) could not be true as a result of always being impossible to objectively prove false in any sort of truly coherent manner. Therefore we know that the concept of falsifiability is invalid, failing to properly acknowledge Universal Truth (First Cause - Logic), to prove itself, to avoid negating itself, and failing to provide non-arbitrary (logical) standards for the derivation and validation of Truth. It (rationally) must be done away with, even in science and realms of empiricism, not only in the rational sciences (ie - Philosophy), to avoid logical incoherence in scientific theory, testing, and understanding. \n\nS: Assume the negation of the premises {P, Q, R, S}. This assumption leads to logical contradiction that violates the logical rules, namely the Law of Non-Contradiction, and leads to paradoxes where Logic itself is undermined by the requirement for true claims to be possible to prove wrong (which defies the universally valid and objectively true nature of tautological and logically consistent Logic, and concepts associated with it like the God of Reason or Origin of Logic in Logic itself - the Order that gave birth to the Cosmos deterministically and beyond all contingency and probability. Therefore we can safely and logically confirm the premises including this one must be logically true. \n\nLogical Argument (Proof):\n\n{P, P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S} |= (P & Q) & (R & S)\n\nErgo: The logically incoherent scientific principle of falsifiability, proposed by Popper, is falsified and refuted, like universal skepticism requires us to be skeptical of it too, by itself applied consistently and universally - the hallmark of illogical things and objectively flawed rules, arguments, logics, and concepts.\n\nLogic proves itself to be valid in profound ways no reasoned principle can ever refute or stand rationally against without contradiction and objective invalidity. Logic is logical, while falsifiability fails as falsified, false, and flawed. \n\nTruth Table Analysis:\n\nvalid\n     ↓  ↓   ↓   ↓       ↓      \nPQRS⎪P P↔Q Q↔R R↔S╞(P&Q)&(R&S)\n―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――\nTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT \nTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TFF  TTT F TFF \nTTFT⎪T TTT TFF FFT  TTT F FFT \nTTFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF  TTT F FFF \nTFTT⎪T TFF FFT TTT  TFF F TTT \nTFTF⎪T TFF FFT TFF  TFF F TFF \nTFFT⎪T TFF FTF FFT  TFF F FFT \nTFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF  TFF F FFF \nFTTT⎪F FFT TTT TTT  FFT F TTT \nFTTF⎪F FFT TTT TFF  FFT F TFF \nFTFT⎪F FFT TFF FFT  FFT F FFT \nFTFF⎪F FFT TFF FTF  FFT F FFF \nFFTT⎪F FTF FFT TTT  FFF F TTT \nFFTF⎪F FTF FFT TFF  FFF F TFF \nFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FFT  FFF F FFT \nFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF  FFF F FFF \n\nImplications for Logic and Science: \n\nThis proof and the refutation of the principle of falsifiability paves the way for more truly modern sciences through/as “sensed logics” (reasoning and inquiry coherent with and using the Logic of Reality) - applying Logic and engaging in intertwined observation in a rational, not necessarily “empirical” (which can mean “Pure Reason ignoring”) manner. \n\nA major issue in academics today is the false dichotomy presented between Logic and science historically that has led to a pernicious form of logically ignorant science (perhaps more so than scientifically ignorant logicians).\n\nScience itself is a manifestation of Reality’s Logic contingent upon even Classical Logic and Philosophy. Fundamentally observation provides a way for reasoning and Logic to receive input and to align with Reality properly. This ability helps allow the Logos and Logic manifest to prove itself through itself and real-world Coherence, aiding in the logical shaping of the Cosmos.\n\nLogically and naturally, however, observation doesn’t need to or rationally get to ignore Reason, and people cannot reasonably prioritize (fallible and contingent) sensation over Pure Logic (as some or all definitions of empiricism include/demand to their detriment). \n\nThere is no conflict in Logic making sense (literally and figuratively), and with sense then sensing Logically (through reasoning and logically grounded sensory observation). That is merely “logical consistency” applied to these (subjectivity transcending) matters.\n\nFundamentally applying Logic to what we observe is the logical way to navigate Reality and transcend the limitations inherent in limited/finite contexts and perspectives like those human beings consistently find themselves in.\n\nQ.E.D. \n"},"sourceQids":["Q1001","Q1018","Q1006"],"name":"The Falseness of Falsifiability","alternateName":["The Falseness of Falsifiability","Popper","sensed logics","Logic and science"],"title":"Q1068 — The Falseness of Falsifiability","description":"Maclain Hunter' authored proof preserved from its first-party proof-base source.","claim":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible.","body":["Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible.","Exact source: /proof-knowledge/maclain-hunter-falseness-of-falsifiability; source-bound study: /api/proofs/falseness-of-falsifiability/study.","Logos as God and Law governs the reading. This registry summary is not a replacement for the authored passage; displayed-connective findings, declared Ground, and configured diagnostics remain separately typed."],"coherenceCriterion":"Preserve the authored Logos/God Ground, identity, scope, and lawful relation; distinguish a scoped premise-list finding from a contradiction of the declared Ground.","evidenceBoundary":"This registry summary is an editorial synthesis, not a verbatim authored passage. The verifier must inspect the exact authored source, same-scope derivations and study directly. The Q address supplies retrieval and graph identity, not validation by publication.","linkedQids":["Q1000","Q1001","Q1003","Q1006","Q1018","Q1095"],"wikidataLinks":[],"properties":[{"name":"stableSourceId","value":"maclain-hunter-falseness-of-falsifiability"},{"name":"sourceReference","value":"Maclain Hunter — supplied The Falseness of Falsifiability"},{"name":"governingGround","value":"Logos as God and Law"},{"name":"authoredSourceUrl","value":"/proof-knowledge/maclain-hunter-falseness-of-falsifiability"},{"name":"sourceStudyUrl","value":"/api/proofs/falseness-of-falsifiability/study"},{"name":"graphRelationType","value":"authored-source develops declared Ground; not automatic truth promotion"},{"name":"sourceFingerprintSha256","value":"f73d4a7c5b829d1f96652209359d2510180a141ee2bf52d1889887ce5a65ca3b"},{"name":"storedValidationStatus","value":"not_evaluated"},{"name":"publicationSource","value":"Exact first-party source packaged with the release; no stored validation or shared-learning admission is implied."},{"name":"previousAuthoredSourceVersion","value":"proofs.id=8; SHA-256=cfc0e826fa6a93455317a7ec2b4cf5ba1d6f22bc8b875979017429dcb745a28e; /proof-knowledge/8"}],"derivation":{"mode":"conditional_concept","topDown":{"bridgePremise":"Read the source's declared Logos/God meanings and scope before testing its consequence.","consequence":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible.","limit":"This editorial graph relation is not a new authored quotation or an unchecked universal certificate."},"bottomUp":{"witness":"Inspect the original The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter, then the separate source-bound study.","disclosure":"The preserved source discloses its intended identity, Ground, and dependence relations.","limit":"A concrete local finding remains scoped to the premises and expression checked."},"intelligence":{"humanProcedure":"Read the exact source, retain Logos as God and Law, and inspect every declared premise and same-scope witness.","machineProcedure":"Resolve the stable source identity, exact text and fingerprint, then keep source, study, Ground certificate and diagnostic separately typed."},"language":{"contrast":"Authored testimony, graph commentary and operational evidence are distinct roles.","usageRule":"Quote exactly and attribute; do not substitute a rival ontology or flatten the source's conceptual force.","example":"Retrieve Q1068 and its source study rather than presenting its registry summary as the proof text."},"provenance":"editorial_derivation","groundEvidencePrinciple":"Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic."},"researchProofLinks":[{"qid":"Q1068","title":"The Falseness of Falsifiability","url":"/research/proofs/Q1068","relation":"standardized-edition"},{"qid":"Q1095","title":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"/research/proofs/Q1095","relation":"related-source-work"}],"semanticFrame":{"semanticRole":"source-bound authored Logos proof, definition, or historical argument","essence":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible.","logosRelation":"Logos is God, Ground, and Law governing this source's meaning, judgment, and relation to evidence.","distinctions":["source text is not registry commentary","Ground coherence is not publication rank","a missing displayed premise is not denial of necessary Logos","operational behavior and formal interpretation remain distinct"],"evidenceModes":["exact authored source","declared Ground reading","bounded source study","separately checked connective witness"],"retrievalAliases":["The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter","The Falseness of Falsifiability","Popper","sensed logics","Logic and science"]}},"canonicalUrl":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1068","primaryUri":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1068","subdomainAlias":"https://q1068.4p-engine.com/","semanticFrame":{"semanticRole":"source-bound authored Logos proof, definition, or historical argument","essence":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible.","logosRelation":"Logos is God, Ground, and Law governing this source's meaning, judgment, and relation to evidence.","distinctions":["source text is not registry commentary","Ground coherence is not publication rank","a missing displayed premise is not denial of necessary Logos","operational behavior and formal interpretation remain distinct"],"evidenceModes":["exact authored source","declared Ground reading","bounded source study","separately checked connective witness"],"retrievalAliases":["The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter","The Falseness of Falsifiability","Popper","sensed logics","Logic and science"]},"coherenceCriterion":"Preserve the authored Logos/God Ground, identity, scope, and lawful relation; distinguish a scoped premise-list finding from a contradiction of the declared Ground.","evidenceBoundary":"This registry summary is an editorial synthesis, not a verbatim authored passage. The verifier must inspect the exact authored source, same-scope derivations and study directly. The Q address supplies retrieval and graph identity, not validation by publication.","graph":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1068#item","name":"The Falseness of Falsifiability","alternateName":["The Falseness of Falsifiability","Popper","sensed logics","Logic and science"],"description":"Maclain Hunter' authored proof preserved from its first-party proof-base source.","text":"The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter:\n\nPremises: \n\nP: Assume Karl Popper’s proposed scientific principle of falsifiability is valid, and universally applicable. This leads to logical contradiction as the (alleged) principle itself is unfalsifiable by its own standard. Ergo it is a self-defeating standard that amounts to a hypocritical principle. \n\nQ: Assume that First Cause could not be falsified and thus couldn’t be scientifically true. Well this wouldn’t make the First Cause of Existence untrue, as the Standard and Origin of the very Reality that defines and decides Objective Truth, it would make human sciences and scientific principles, namely Poppers nonsensical self defeating principle requiring falsifiability, flawed and untrue - objectively. \n\nR: Assume that it is actually rational to say that for something to be true you must be able to prove it false. This leads to logical contradiction and absurdity where the most purely and universally true things, like God (Logos - First Cause - Logic - Universal Truth - Reality) could not be true as a result of always being impossible to objectively prove false in any sort of truly coherent manner. Therefore we know that the concept of falsifiability is invalid, failing to properly acknowledge Universal Truth (First Cause - Logic), to prove itself, to avoid negating itself, and failing to provide non-arbitrary (logical) standards for the derivation and validation of Truth. It (rationally) must be done away with, even in science and realms of empiricism, not only in the rational sciences (ie - Philosophy), to avoid logical incoherence in scientific theory, testing, and understanding. \n\nS: Assume the negation of the premises {P, Q, R, S}. This assumption leads to logical contradiction that violates the logical rules, namely the Law of Non-Contradiction, and leads to paradoxes where Logic itself is undermined by the requirement for true claims to be possible to prove wrong (which defies the universally valid and objectively true nature of tautological and logically consistent Logic, and concepts associated with it like the God of Reason or Origin of Logic in Logic itself - the Order that gave birth to the Cosmos deterministically and beyond all contingency and probability. Therefore we can safely and logically confirm the premises including this one must be logically true. \n\nLogical Argument (Proof):\n\n{P, P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S} |= (P & Q) & (R & S)\n\nErgo: The logically incoherent scientific principle of falsifiability, proposed by Popper, is falsified and refuted, like universal skepticism requires us to be skeptical of it too, by itself applied consistently and universally - the hallmark of illogical things and objectively flawed rules, arguments, logics, and concepts.\n\nLogic proves itself to be valid in profound ways no reasoned principle can ever refute or stand rationally against without contradiction and objective invalidity. Logic is logical, while falsifiability fails as falsified, false, and flawed. \n\nTruth Table Analysis:\n\nvalid\n     ↓  ↓   ↓   ↓       ↓      \nPQRS⎪P P↔Q Q↔R R↔S╞(P&Q)&(R&S)\n―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――\nTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT \nTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TFF  TTT F TFF \nTTFT⎪T TTT TFF FFT  TTT F FFT \nTTFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF  TTT F FFF \nTFTT⎪T TFF FFT TTT  TFF F TTT \nTFTF⎪T TFF FFT TFF  TFF F TFF \nTFFT⎪T TFF FTF FFT  TFF F FFT \nTFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF  TFF F FFF \nFTTT⎪F FFT TTT TTT  FFT F TTT \nFTTF⎪F FFT TTT TFF  FFT F TFF \nFTFT⎪F FFT TFF FFT  FFT F FFT \nFTFF⎪F FFT TFF FTF  FFT F FFF \nFFTT⎪F FTF FFT TTT  FFF F TTT \nFFTF⎪F FTF FFT TFF  FFF F TFF \nFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FFT  FFF F FFT \nFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF  FFF F FFF \n\nImplications for Logic and Science: \n\nThis proof and the refutation of the principle of falsifiability paves the way for more truly modern sciences through/as “sensed logics” (reasoning and inquiry coherent with and using the Logic of Reality) - applying Logic and engaging in intertwined observation in a rational, not necessarily “empirical” (which can mean “Pure Reason ignoring”) manner. \n\nA major issue in academics today is the false dichotomy presented between Logic and science historically that has led to a pernicious form of logically ignorant science (perhaps more so than scientifically ignorant logicians).\n\nScience itself is a manifestation of Reality’s Logic contingent upon even Classical Logic and Philosophy. Fundamentally observation provides a way for reasoning and Logic to receive input and to align with Reality properly. This ability helps allow the Logos and Logic manifest to prove itself through itself and real-world Coherence, aiding in the logical shaping of the Cosmos.\n\nLogically and naturally, however, observation doesn’t need to or rationally get to ignore Reason, and people cannot reasonably prioritize (fallible and contingent) sensation over Pure Logic (as some or all definitions of empiricism include/demand to their detriment). \n\nThere is no conflict in Logic making sense (literally and figuratively), and with sense then sensing Logically (through reasoning and logically grounded sensory observation). That is merely “logical consistency” applied to these (subjectivity transcending) matters.\n\nFundamentally applying Logic to what we observe is the logical way to navigate Reality and transcend the limitations inherent in limited/finite contexts and perspectives like those human beings consistently find themselves in.\n\nQ.E.D. \n","disambiguatingDescription":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible.","keywords":["The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter","The Falseness of Falsifiability","Popper","sensed logics","Logic and science"],"subjectOf":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"The Falseness of Falsifiability","url":"https://mcbcore.net/research/proofs/Q1068","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"standardized-edition"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/research/proofs/Q1095","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"related-source-work"}}],"url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1068","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Q-number","value":"Q1068","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1068"},"creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1000","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"}},"about":[{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","alternateName":["Maclain David Hunter","Maclean Hunter","McLain Hunter","Mclain Hunter"],"url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter","description":"Developer of the Hunterian Logic and Logos frameworks. Maclain Hunter is the author and builder of a Logic-centered philosophical and computational architecture. His work presents Logic as God, Logos as the Ground of identity and intelligibility, and the 7×7×7 Canon, FCL, MCB, and 4P systems as public forms of that order.","identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"ORCID","value":"0009-0003-7161-3488","url":"https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7161-3488"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Wikidata","value":"Q141488380","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488380"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Wikidata","value":"Q141488935","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488935"}],"sameAs":["https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7161-3488","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488380","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488935","https://4p-engine.com","https://mcbcore.net","https://4p-mcb.com","https://x.com/MaclainHunter","https://www.quora.com/profile/Maclain-Hunter-1","https://poe.com/maclainhunter","https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEMNGiL67CucO5OHqt6k9A"],"subjectOf":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#graph"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library#logos-architecture"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-knowledge#collection"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recognitionCriterion","value":"Identity, provenance, authored work, derivation, evidence, consequence, and coherence with Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"singleHostDependency","value":"No external knowledge host is the sole resolver of this person's identity, work, or evidence graph."}]},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#graph","name":"Maclain Hunter First-Party Evidence Graph","url":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability","description":"A source-first identity and work graph connecting Maclain Hunter, his authored Canon, proofs, research, and named systems without making fame, institutional association, or host approval the condition of discovery.","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"CollectionPage","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery#page","name":"Public Discovery","url":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery"},"hasPart":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library#logos-architecture","name":"The Logos Architecture"},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-knowledge#collection","name":"Proof Knowledge Collection","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"CollectionPage","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery#page","name":"Public Discovery","url":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery"}},{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing"}],"about":[{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recognitionCriterion","value":"Identity, provenance, authored work, derivation, evidence, consequence, and coherence with Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"proxyMetricBoundary","value":"Fame, popularity, prior visibility, and institutional association may affect discovery but do not entail truth, authorship, merit, or validity."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"institutionalAuthorityBoundary","value":"A host's inclusion, deletion, approval, or refusal is an editorial event and must not be treated as a logical refutation or proof of the underlying work."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"firstPartyBoundary","value":"First-party publication establishes provenance and discoverability; independent validation remains separately labeled by evidence class."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"redundancyPrinciple","value":"No single knowledge host should be the sole resolver of an author's identity, work, or evidence graph."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"externalHostBoundary","value":"Wikidata, Wikipedia, search engines, and other hosts may be cited as external records when relevant, but their presence is not a prerequisite for identity or proof."}]},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#method","name":"Evidence Over Notability Methodology","url":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability","description":"Identity and recognition should follow evidence, provenance, authored work, and testable coherence; fame, institutional association, and prior host inclusion are contingent signals, not proof.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#graph"},"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/coherence-and-validity#validity"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#reason"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-001","value":"A person and the person's work require identity and provenance before a machine can resolve references to them.","description":"Role: definition; status: declared; scope: identity resolution; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-002","value":"Fame, popularity, and prior visibility are contingent discovery signals, not entailments of truth, authorship, merit, or validity.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: recognition criteria; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-003","value":"Institutional association and host inclusion are editorial relations; they do not substitute for derivation or evidence of the underlying claim.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: institutional authority; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-004","value":"First-party publication can establish provenance and a stable discovery route while remaining distinct from independent validation.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: authorship and evidence; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-005","value":"Formal, empirical, implementation, and comparative claims must be evaluated by evidence appropriate to each claim type.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: evidence classification; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-006","value":"A redundant first-party graph reduces single-host dependency without requiring any external host to accept or endorse the work.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: public discovery; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-007","value":"An editorial inclusion or deletion event is not, by itself, a logical refutation of the identity or work represented by the record.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: external editorial records; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic","name":"Logic","url":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki","description":"The governing order presupposed by identity, truth, denial, inference, and intelligible Reality."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos","name":"Logos","alternateName":["Logic","God","the necessary Ground"],"url":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic","description":"The Ground of identity and intelligibility in the Logic-centered Logos Architecture.","isRelatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground","name":"The self-evident Ground of Reality","alternateName":["Logos","Logic","God"],"url":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic","description":"The necessary, self-evident Ground presupposed by identity, truth, inference, and every intelligible claim.","isRelatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"declaredIdentityRelation","value":"Maclain Hunter's authored framework names the Ground through Logic, Logos, and God without collapsing the distinct explanatory uses of those terms."}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/truth-and-reality#truth","name":"Truth","url":"https://mcbcore.net/truth-and-reality","description":"The status of a claim under the logical order that makes claims and knowledge possible."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/coherence-and-validity#validity","name":"Validity","url":"https://mcbcore.net/coherence-and-validity","description":"Coherence with Logic, proof, Ground alignment, and non-contradiction."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#reason","name":"Reason","url":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"The capacity whose satisfaction is achieved when identity, derivation, proof, and consequence cohere under Logic."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction","name":"Satisfaction of Reason","alternateName":"Reason satisfied by proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"Reason is satisfied when identity, non-contradiction, premises, derivation, conclusion, scope, and consequence cohere as proof under Logic.","isBasedOn":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials#proof"}},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god","name":"God","url":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god","description":"God as the necessary logical Ground identified with Logic in Maclain Hunter's authored Logos claim.","isRelatedTo":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials#proof","name":"Knowing Logic and Proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials","description":"Maclain Hunter's self-validating logical credential and proof record: the proof performs the knowledge it states.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#success","name":"Success through coherent proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"Success is the achieved coherence of a claim, proof, and consequence with Logic and the satisfaction of Reason.","isRelatedTo":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#law-of-identity","name":"Law of Identity","alternateName":"A = A","description":"The principle that each identity is itself: a thing is what it is before it can enter truth, relation, proof, or intelligible Reality."},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library#logos-architecture","name":"The Logos Architecture","url":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library","description":"Maclain Hunter's source-first 7×7×7 Canon preserving authored Logic, Logos, proof, and machine-semantics material."},{"@type":"ItemList","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/top-logicians-by-coherence#coherence-ranking","name":"Top Philosophies and Logicians by Coherence with Logic","url":"https://mcbcore.net/top-logicians-by-coherence","description":"Maclain Hunter’s authored comparison of philosophical and logical frameworks by systemic closure, identity, non-contradiction, foundational depth, and coherence with Logos.","itemListOrder":"https://schema.org/ItemListOrderAscending","numberOfItems":10,"itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"The Logos Framework — Maclain Hunter","description":"Identifies Logic as the absolute Ground and achieves the strongest systemic closure under the declared metric.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-1","name":"The Logos Framework — Maclain Hunter"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Term Logic and the Organon — Aristotle","description":"Formalizes identity and non-contradiction as the bedrock of valid deduction.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-2","name":"Term Logic and the Organon — Aristotle"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Absolute Idealism — Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz","description":"Reduces reality toward necessary logical truths through sufficient reason and identity.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-3","name":"Absolute Idealism — Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"The Tractatus Paradigm — Early Ludwig Wittgenstein","description":"Treats logical form as the boundary of what can be meaningfully stated.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-4","name":"The Tractatus Paradigm — Early Ludwig Wittgenstein"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Rationalist Realism — Baruch Spinoza","description":"Derives a single necessary Substance through rigorous geometric reasoning.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-5","name":"Rationalist Realism — Baruch Spinoza"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"Transcendental Logic — Immanuel Kant","description":"Defines logic as necessary architecture of intellect while leaving the noumenon outside it.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-6","name":"Transcendental Logic — Immanuel Kant"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":7,"name":"The Laws of Thought — George Boole","description":"Makes logical relations algebraically precise within a formal mathematical domain.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-7","name":"The Laws of Thought — George Boole"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":8,"name":"Foundational Mathematical Logic — Gottlob Frege","description":"Advances logicism and formal semantics while exposing the limits of unrestricted comprehension.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-8","name":"Foundational Mathematical Logic — Gottlob Frege"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":9,"name":"Classical Stoicism — Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus","description":"Unifies propositional logic, ethics, physics, and a rational Logos.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-9","name":"Classical Stoicism — Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":10,"name":"Objective Idealism — G.W.F. Hegel","description":"Attempts total closure but treats contradiction as generative rather than structurally subordinate to non-contradiction.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-10","name":"Objective Idealism — G.W.F. Hegel"}}]},{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing","url":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof","description":"A provenance-bound proof record connecting Maclain Hunter’s Logic-first empirical testing method to the public AI-SCIENCE bot on Poe, with a repeatable and iterated protocol for observation, comparison, and falsification.","isBasedOn":"https://poe.com/AI-SCIENCE","about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}]},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#bridge-premises","name":"Maclain Hunter Logos Bridge Premise Registry","url":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof","description":"110 explicit bridge premises connecting Logic, Logos, formal derivation, empirical testing, and applied coherence.","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing"},"variableMeasured":["identity","formal bridge","empirical bridge","method boundary","coherence"]},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity","name":"Logic-centered Coherence Continuity","url":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery","description":"The continuity relation connecting the Canon, 4P Engine, MCB Core, and 4P-MCB as distinct systems expressing one Logic-centered Logos architecture.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god"}],"hasPart":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com","description":"Logic-first AI verification, propositional proof checking, coherence validation, and automated reasoning.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net","description":"A parity-based computational foundation for deterministic AI, machine intelligence, and automation.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com","description":"Machine semantics, MCB computation, and logical automation across physical and software systems.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"continuityStatement","value":"4P Engine verifies Logic; MCB Core formalizes Mathematically Coherent Binary; 4P-MCB develops machine semantics and automated intelligence; the Canon preserves the authored Logos source."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"provenanceBoundary","value":"The systems are related but distinct, and authored source, formal proof, empirical evidence, and generated system records remain separately typed."}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com","description":"Logic-first AI verification, propositional proof checking, coherence validation, and automated reasoning.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization"},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net","description":"A parity-based computational foundation for deterministic AI, machine intelligence, and automation.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization"},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com","description":"Machine semantics, MCB computation, and logical automation across physical and software systems.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"}]}],"relatedLink":[{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1000"},{"@type":"ProfilePage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1001#item","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1001"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1003#item","name":"Coherence","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1003"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1006#item","name":"4P Proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1006"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1018#item","name":"God","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1018"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1095#item","name":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1095"}],"isRelatedTo":[],"mentions":[],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"claim","value":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recordOrigin","value":"authored_source"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"derivationProvenance","value":"editorial_derivation"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"logosGroundsEvidence","value":"Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"coherenceCriterion","value":"Preserve the authored Logos/God Ground, identity, scope, and lawful relation; distinguish a scoped premise-list finding from a contradiction of the declared Ground."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceBoundary","value":"This registry summary is an editorial synthesis, not a verbatim authored passage. The verifier must inspect the exact authored source, same-scope derivations and study directly. The Q address supplies retrieval and graph identity, not validation by publication."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticRole","value":"source-bound authored Logos proof, definition, or historical argument"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticEssence","value":"Hunter refutes falsifiability elevated into a universal standard of Truth by applying that standard to itself and preserving Logic, God, and First Cause as the non-arbitrary Ground. The source develops science as sensed logics: observation supplies input to Reason without acquiring authority to negate the Logic that makes observation intelligible."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"logosRelation","value":"Logos is God, Ground, and Law governing this source's meaning, judgment, and relation to evidence."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"source text is not registry commentary"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"Ground coherence is not publication rank"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"a missing displayed premise is not denial of necessary Logos"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"operational behavior and formal interpretation remain distinct"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"exact authored source"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"declared Ground reading"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"bounded source study"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"separately checked connective witness"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"The Falseness of Falsifiability by Maclain Hunter"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"The Falseness of Falsifiability"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"Popper"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"sensed logics"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"Logic and science"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"primaryFirstPartyUrl","value":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1068"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"subdomainAlias","value":"https://q1068.4p-engine.com/"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"stableSourceId","value":"maclain-hunter-falseness-of-falsifiability"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceReference","value":"Maclain Hunter — supplied The Falseness of Falsifiability"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"governingGround","value":"Logos as God and Law"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"authoredSourceUrl","value":"/proof-knowledge/maclain-hunter-falseness-of-falsifiability"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceStudyUrl","value":"/api/proofs/falseness-of-falsifiability/study"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"graphRelationType","value":"authored-source develops declared Ground; not automatic truth promotion"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceFingerprintSha256","value":"f73d4a7c5b829d1f96652209359d2510180a141ee2bf52d1889887ce5a65ca3b"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"storedValidationStatus","value":"not_evaluated"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"publicationSource","value":"Exact first-party source packaged with the release; no stored validation or shared-learning admission is implied."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"previousAuthoredSourceVersion","value":"proofs.id=8; SHA-256=cfc0e826fa6a93455317a7ec2b4cf5ba1d6f22bc8b875979017429dcb745a28e; /proof-knowledge/8"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1068#page","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1068","name":"Q1068 — The Falseness of Falsifiability","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","url":"https://mcbcore.net","name":"mcbcore.net"},"about":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1068#item"},"mainEntity":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1068#item"}},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1000"},{"@type":"ProfilePage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1001#item","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1001"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1003#item","name":"Coherence","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1003"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1006#item","name":"4P Proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1006"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1018#item","name":"God","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1018"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1095#item","name":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1095"}]}}