{"ok":true,"protocol":"maclain_hunter_q_number_item_v1","qid":"Q10934284368","item":{"qid":"Q10934284368","slug":"mcb-virtual-ic-signal-flow","path":"/q/Q10934284368","subdomain":"q10934284368.4p-engine.com","schemaType":"SoftwareSourceCode","recordOrigin":"editorial_synthesis","sourceQids":["Q1272","Q1096"],"name":"Virtual MCB Integrated Circuit — Signal-Flow and Physics Boundary","alternateName":["Virtual MCB IC","MCB IC Signal-Flow Simulator","Eleven-Part MCB Virtual Circuit"],"title":"Q10934284368 — Virtual MCB Integrated Circuit","discoveryMetadata":{"title":"Virtual MCB Integrated Circuit — Native Signal Flow","description":"Run the eleven-part MCB IC as a typed native MCB program, inspect reference-checked traces, and see why component physics is not yet source-supported."},"description":"An interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC. A typed native MCB data program executes its oscillator, input splitter, signed exponent paths, current sums, amplifier decision, output, and one-tick feedback; every returned tick is checked against the preserved TypeScript reference adapter. A source-review panel maps each component's missing physics parameters without inventing device behavior.","claim":"The runnable native MCB program deterministically advances the specified finite signal-flow path and exposes every modeled state and current contribution. The supplied specifications do not support an equation-driven transistor-physics mode; machine-native CPU execution and physical-device behavior remain outside its evidence claim.","body":["This record describes a software realization of the creator's eleven-part MCB IC topology. Its ordered component inventory and signal connections are visible in the simulator rather than collapsed into a single output claim.","The complete eleven-component inventory and declared wires are retained in a typed native MCB data program. Allowlisted exact-integer, signed-state, signal, and feedback operations execute the rail oscillator, guard-band decoding, one-to-one splitter, exponent paths, signed current accumulation, amplifier decision, output voltage, and next-tick feedback.","The original TypeScript step remains an independent reference adapter. The native executor compares the complete tick trace and next state with that reference before returning a result; this establishes deterministic implementation parity for tested inputs, not formal proof of the interpreter.","A related Lean witness, Q11672988881, proves evalMCB e = sumMCBData (mcbContributions e) for every expression in the formal MCBExpr language. Its empty added axiom-dependency report is bound to the archived Lean source fingerprint 28e2325f196d3d9a5732a05425105305eacbf525fd82bc8e7158a3c5335c416d.","That theorem establishes the encoded expression-summation equality. It does not, by itself, prove this TypeScript tick implementation, every runtime behavior, NI candidate interpretation, or physical transistor behavior; those retain their own implementation and evidence boundaries.","The n layer is an ordered safe-integer exponent array evaluated through the existing exact MCB exponent function. The s layer is the resulting populated set of one-to-one signal paths. The m layer records valid signed-output feedback depth; an undefined output does not increase that depth.","The external input supply and internal circuit supply are separate parameters. The internal rail follows a deterministic periodic oscillation; input guard bands, rail incompatibility, exact current cancellation, and amplifier decision-band cases remain unresolved rather than being coerced to either signed state.","The second Base is phase-locked to the primary Base in this model. Its configured total current is divided exactly into ten equal integer paths: nine return paths and one amplifier injection path.","The simulator uses illustrative, editable voltage thresholds and current values. The amplifier is an ideal signed-current decision stage, the power paths have no modeled resistance, and the oscillator is a deterministic state source.","The reviewed MCB-NLP architecture report describes exponent arrays, signed states, abstract algebraic operations, and language-processing layers, not IC component equations or electrical values. The virtual-chip ecosystem brief describes a bivalent software concept, web/WASM integration, telemetry, and broad resource claims, but supplies no transistor models, pin-level connections, physical parameters, or measurements. Three related Core Realization notes make broad cross-substrate mapping assertions and include pseudo-code examples of 4.0e9 and 1.2e12 Hz substrate rates; they do not define this circuit's oscillator or measured performance.","A source-backed candidate package now identifies vendor BSS84 PMOS and 2N7002 NMOS SPICE cards, device terminal order, example trace equations, source/load models, and reference parameters for all eleven functional blocks. The candidates do not supply the actual MCB schematic: circuit-node assignments, bias conditions, oscillator network, supply behavior, feedback components, and loads remain unresolved.","No separate component-physics mode is enabled. The eleven candidate entries are reference models and examples, not a selected or validated circuit; the 3.3 V software defaults and example trace geometry remain illustrative, and the pseudo-code substrate clock rates are not physical oscillator values.","This executable signal-flow model is not a transistor-level device simulation, a fabricated circuit, a physical measurement, a validated performance or speed result, or a claim that the software removes computational bottlenecks.","The model is related to Q1272, Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields, and Q1096, Logic in Physics. Those authored records remain distinct sources and are not rewritten by this editorial implementation record."],"derivation":{"mode":"conditional_concept","topDown":{"bridgePremise":"The creator's eleven-part circuit topology and exact MCB Base/exponent semantics are the stated design premises for this virtual realization.","consequence":"Given the finite configuration, input voltage, and prior tick state, the simulator computes an inspectable next signal-flow result.","limit":"The consequence is software execution under explicit parameters; it does not derive transistor behavior or a physical performance claim."},"bottomUp":{"witness":"The fingerprinted native component graph and UI expose deterministic per-tick states, exponent paths, supply rails, current split, feedback, and output; each native result is compared with the independent reference adapter.","disclosure":"Unit checks cover all eleven components and declared wires, registered native operations, full-trace parity, MCB exponent parity, separate supplies, unresolved voltage bands, feedback, safe-integer boundaries, and exact 9:1 current division. The candidate evidence package covers all eleven functions (11 entries); the actual circuit netlist and operating conditions are still not source-defined.","limit":"Code and tests establish implementation behavior only, not circuit fabrication, measurement, or empirical validity."},"intelligence":{"humanProcedure":"Set model parameters and an external input, then inspect each returned path and tick.","machineProcedure":"Execute the typed native MCB operation graph: compute oscillator and voltage states, split and transform signed paths, sum exact safe-integer currents, decide the amplifier output, and carry only a defined signed output into the next tick; compare the complete result with the reference adapter."},"language":{"contrast":"A virtual signal-flow model is distinct from a transistor-level electrical simulation or physical IC.","usageRule":"Describe its outputs as simulated states under named parameters; do not present them as measurements.","example":"This tick resolves the configured input to a signed output and records the current paths that produced it."},"provenance":"editorial_derivation","groundEvidencePrinciple":"Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic."},"coherenceCriterion":"The virtual realization must preserve the eleven-part identity and declared wires in the native MCB program, exact MCB exponent semantics, explicit supply and current parameters, in-phase 9:1 branch, ordered one-tick feedback, reference-trace parity, and a visible boundary between software results and physical evidence. Enable component physics only after the complete circuit netlist, device choices, bias/reference conditions, supplies, and loads are fixed and supported by source-backed models.","evidenceBoundary":"The fingerprint identifies the typed native program, reference adapter, candidate device-evidence package, physics-readiness disclosure, reviewed source documents, and UI. Deterministic tests establish finite software execution and parity only; candidate vendor models do not establish this circuit's transistor behavior, fabrication, measurement, or physical performance.","linkedQids":["Q1272","Q1096","Q1079","Q1081","Q11672988881"],"researchProofLinks":[{"qid":"Q10934284368","title":"Open the interactive Virtual MCB IC","url":"/mcb/virtual-ic","relation":"runnable-signal-flow-model"},{"qid":"Q11672988881","title":"Lean witness: MCB expression self-summation","url":"/q/lean-witness-11672988881","relation":"scoped-formal-expression-witness"},{"qid":"Q11672988881","title":"Native MCB proof source and verification","url":"/proof-verification/native-mcb","relation":"source-bound-formal-verification"},{"qid":"Q1272","title":"Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields","url":"/q/Q1272","relation":"distinct-first-party-source"},{"qid":"Q1096","title":"Logic in Physics","url":"/q/Q1096","relation":"distinct-authored-physics-work"},{"qid":"Q1079","title":"4P-MCB Machine Semantics","url":"/research/proofs/Q1079","relation":"related-source-work"},{"qid":"Q1096","title":"Logic in Physics by Maclain Hunter","url":"/research/proofs/Q1096","relation":"related-source-work"},{"qid":"Q1272","title":"Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields","url":"/research/proofs/Q1272","relation":"related-source-work"}],"wikidataLinks":[],"properties":[{"name":"sourceSha256","value":"7c5448173601bf87afd6b6508fd0ba22824802605cf3ba62408015d84c6d2d23"},{"name":"relatedLeanWitnessQid","value":"Q11672988881"},{"name":"relatedLeanTheorem","value":"NetworkSources.Native.NativeMCBEvidence.mcb_self_summation"},{"name":"relatedLeanSourceSha256","value":"28e2325f196d3d9a5732a05425105305eacbf525fd82bc8e7158a3c5335c416d"},{"name":"relatedLeanWitnessScope","value":"Native MCB mathematical witness; separately attributed machine formalization of Hunter's design."},{"name":"relatedLeanWitnessBoundary","value":"Proves the formal MCBExpr self-summation law; not the TypeScript IC, NI semantics, or physical hardware."},{"name":"sourceFiles","value":"shared/mcb-virtual-ic.ts; shared/logic/mcb-functional.ts; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic.tsx; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic.css; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic-physics-status.tsx; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic-physics-status.css; attached_assets/Pasted-TECHNICAL-SPECIFICATION-REPORT-ARCHITECTURAL-REQUIREMEN_1789870645712.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--Customizing-the-Virtual-Chip-for-the-MCB-Ecosystem-Whe_1792393623636.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790947184413.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946942815.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946176351.txt"},{"name":"reviewedSourceDocuments","value":"attached_assets/Pasted-TECHNICAL-SPECIFICATION-REPORT-ARCHITECTURAL-REQUIREMEN_1789870645712.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--Customizing-the-Virtual-Chip-for-the-MCB-Ecosystem-Whe_1792393623636.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790947184413.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946942815.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946176351.txt"},{"name":"deviceModelSourceLocations","value":"https://www.diodes.com/spice/download/2330/BSS84.spice.txt; https://www.diodes.com/datasheet/download/BSS84.pdf; https://www.diodes.com/spice/download/1941/2N7002.spice.txt; https://www.diodes.com/datasheet/download/2N7002.pdf; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-4247; http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Tables/rstiv.html; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-2613; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-13313; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-23282; https://download.tek.com/datasheet/P6139B-and-P5050B-500MHz-Passive-Probes_Datasheet-51W261505.pdf"},{"name":"componentPhysicsMode","value":"unavailable: Candidate transistor cards and component equations are now sourced, but the reviewed design still does not define a complete terminal-level netlist, physical operating points, oscillator network, or loads."},{"name":"componentPhysicsCoverage","value":"11 source-linked candidate records cover the eleven functional blocks; exact authored circuit nodes, operating points, full amplifier/oscillator networks, and several passive values remain unresolved."},{"name":"modelVersion","value":"mcb-virtual-ic-native-v1"},{"name":"nativeProgramContract","value":"mcb-native-data-function-v1; typed exact integers, signed states, signals, and feedback; 11 components and the declared wire set."},{"name":"referenceParity","value":"Every native tick and next state must exactly match stepMCBVirtualIC before it is returned."},{"name":"componentCount","value":"11"},{"name":"MCBBase","value":"-1"},{"name":"nLayer","value":"Ordered integer exponent positions evaluated by exactMCBExponent."},{"name":"sLayer","value":"One populated signal path per ordered exponent position."},{"name":"mLayer","value":"Count of valid signed amplifier outputs available for recursive feedback."},{"name":"secondaryBaseCurrentPaths","value":"9 return : 1 amplifier injection; equal integer-valued branches."},{"name":"executionBoundary","value":"Typed native MCB data program with reference parity; software execution only, not machine-native CPU execution or transistor device physics."},{"name":"simulatorRoute","value":"/mcb/virtual-ic"}],"semanticFrame":{"semanticRole":"interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC","essence":"A deterministic finite signal-flow realization executes all eleven circuit components through a typed native MCB data program, exposing signed exponent paths, separate supplies, oscillating rail, the exact 9:1 current split, amplifier decision, one-tick feedback and external output.","logosRelation":"The model keeps the authored Base and exponent semantics explicit, distinguishes MCB signed states from exact integer current values, and preserves unresolved states. Each native trace is checked against the preserved reference adapter. A separately linked Lean witness establishes self-summation in the defined MCB expression language; neither theorem nor software execution replaces Logic / Logos / God as Ground.","distinctions":["MCB exponent evaluation versus a conventional zero/one encoding","ordered n exponent positions versus their s signal-path population","m feedback depth versus an unbounded self-reference claim","typed native MCB data-program execution versus machine-native CPU execution","native/reference trace parity versus a formal proof of the implementation","ideal signed-current simulation versus transistor device physics","executable virtual behavior versus fabrication, measurement, and performance evidence","source-bound MCB expression proof versus verification of this TypeScript simulator"],"evidenceModes":["source-bound native program, reference adapter, and UI fingerprints","deterministic native tick traces checked against the reference adapter","unit checks for typed operations, exponent parity, guard bands, feedback, supply separation, and the 9:1 branch","separately scoped Lean witness for the MCB expression-summation law"],"retrievalAliases":["Virtual MCB IC","virtual MCB integrated circuit","MCB IC signal-flow simulator","MCB hardware model","eleven-part MCB circuit"]}},"canonicalUrl":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q10934284368","primaryUri":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368","subdomainAlias":"https://q10934284368.4p-engine.com/","semanticFrame":{"semanticRole":"interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC","essence":"A deterministic finite signal-flow realization executes all eleven circuit components through a typed native MCB data program, exposing signed exponent paths, separate supplies, oscillating rail, the exact 9:1 current split, amplifier decision, one-tick feedback and external output.","logosRelation":"The model keeps the authored Base and exponent semantics explicit, distinguishes MCB signed states from exact integer current values, and preserves unresolved states. Each native trace is checked against the preserved reference adapter. A separately linked Lean witness establishes self-summation in the defined MCB expression language; neither theorem nor software execution replaces Logic / Logos / God as Ground.","distinctions":["MCB exponent evaluation versus a conventional zero/one encoding","ordered n exponent positions versus their s signal-path population","m feedback depth versus an unbounded self-reference claim","typed native MCB data-program execution versus machine-native CPU execution","native/reference trace parity versus a formal proof of the implementation","ideal signed-current simulation versus transistor device physics","executable virtual behavior versus fabrication, measurement, and performance evidence","source-bound MCB expression proof versus verification of this TypeScript simulator"],"evidenceModes":["source-bound native program, reference adapter, and UI fingerprints","deterministic native tick traces checked against the reference adapter","unit checks for typed operations, exponent parity, guard bands, feedback, supply separation, and the 9:1 branch","separately scoped Lean witness for the MCB expression-summation law"],"retrievalAliases":["Virtual MCB IC","virtual MCB integrated circuit","MCB IC signal-flow simulator","MCB hardware model","eleven-part MCB circuit"]},"coherenceCriterion":"The virtual realization must preserve the eleven-part identity and declared wires in the native MCB program, exact MCB exponent semantics, explicit supply and current parameters, in-phase 9:1 branch, ordered one-tick feedback, reference-trace parity, and a visible boundary between software results and physical evidence. Enable component physics only after the complete circuit netlist, device choices, bias/reference conditions, supplies, and loads are fixed and supported by source-backed models.","evidenceBoundary":"The fingerprint identifies the typed native program, reference adapter, candidate device-evidence package, physics-readiness disclosure, reviewed source documents, and UI. Deterministic tests establish finite software execution and parity only; candidate vendor models do not establish this circuit's transistor behavior, fabrication, measurement, or physical performance.","graph":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"SoftwareSourceCode","programmingLanguage":{"@type":"ComputerLanguage","name":"Lean 4"},"creator":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Replit Agent","description":"Machine formalization; original authored argument/design remains attributed to Maclain Hunter."},"encoding":{"@type":"MediaObject","encodingFormat":"text/plain","contentUrl":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-network.lean"},"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368#item","name":"Virtual MCB Integrated Circuit — Signal-Flow and Physics Boundary","alternateName":["Virtual MCB IC","MCB IC Signal-Flow Simulator","Eleven-Part MCB Virtual Circuit"],"description":"An interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC. A typed native MCB data program executes its oscillator, input splitter, signed exponent paths, current sums, amplifier decision, output, and one-tick feedback; every returned tick is checked against the preserved TypeScript reference adapter. A source-review panel maps each component's missing physics parameters without inventing device behavior.","disambiguatingDescription":"A deterministic finite signal-flow realization executes all eleven circuit components through a typed native MCB data program, exposing signed exponent paths, separate supplies, oscillating rail, the exact 9:1 current split, amplifier decision, one-tick feedback and external output.","keywords":["Virtual MCB IC","virtual MCB integrated circuit","MCB IC signal-flow simulator","MCB hardware model","eleven-part MCB circuit"],"subjectOf":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Open the interactive Virtual MCB IC","url":"https://mcbcore.net/mcb/virtual-ic","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"runnable-signal-flow-model"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Lean witness: MCB expression self-summation","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/lean-witness-11672988881","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"scoped-formal-expression-witness"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Native MCB proof source and verification","url":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-verification/native-mcb","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"source-bound-formal-verification"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1272","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"distinct-first-party-source"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Logic in Physics","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1096","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"distinct-authored-physics-work"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"4P-MCB Machine Semantics","url":"https://mcbcore.net/research/proofs/Q1079","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"related-source-work"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Logic in Physics by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/research/proofs/Q1096","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"related-source-work"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields","url":"https://mcbcore.net/research/proofs/Q1272","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"related-source-work"}}],"url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q10934284368","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Q-number","value":"Q10934284368","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368"},"isBasedOn":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1272#item","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1272"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1096#item","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1096"}],"isPartOf":{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1000","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"}},"about":[{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","alternateName":["Maclain David Hunter","Maclean Hunter","McLain Hunter","Mclain Hunter"],"url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter","description":"Developer of the Hunterian Logic and Logos frameworks. Maclain Hunter is the author and builder of a Logic-centered philosophical and computational architecture. His work presents Logic as God, Logos as the Ground of identity and intelligibility, and the 7×7×7 Canon, FCL, MCB, and 4P systems as public forms of that order.","identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"X handle","value":"@MaclainHunter","url":"https://x.com/MaclainHunter"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"ORCID","value":"0009-0003-7161-3488","url":"https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7161-3488"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Wikidata","value":"Q141488380","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488380"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Wikidata","value":"Q141488935","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488935"}],"sameAs":["https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7161-3488","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488380","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488935","https://4p-engine.com","https://mcbcore.net","https://4p-mcb.com","https://x.com/MaclainHunter","https://www.quora.com/profile/Maclain-Hunter-1","https://poe.com/maclainhunter","https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEMNGiL67CucO5OHqt6k9A"],"knowsAbout":["Lean, Coq and Isabelle proof confirmation","source-bound formal proof networks","MCB homoiconicity and self-summation","artificial intelligence","AI alignment","Logic","intelligence","Reality","science","automation","machine semantics","Mathematically Coherent Binary","propositional logic","deterministic reasoning","self-validating logical credentials","Knowing Logic and Proof","philosophy of Logic and proof","philosopher-logician","philosophy of computation","computational metaphysics","scientific testing of logical proofs","scientific testing of Logic is God","Logic-is-God scientific proof program","Oxford English Dictionary definition of god","OED god entry","Logical-Scientific Triangulation","empirical validation of formal proofs","proof-linked machine semantics","provenance-aware AI memory","343-node Logos Architecture","7×7×7 Canon","rankings by coherence with Logic","true wealth through Coherence","wealth as negentropy","entropy-matching value","Coherence as the measure of true wealth","AI-SCIENCE Bot on Poe","AI-SCIENCE empirical proof","replicable empirical testing","iterated empirical testing","Logic-first empirical demonstration","has science confirmed God","has science proved God","does science confirm God","scientific evidence for God","science and God","science finding God","how science finds God","can science prove God","can science confirm the existence of God","what is the origin of the universe","what caused the origin of the universe","scientific origin of the universe","God as origin of the universe","Logos as origin","Logic as the Ground of Reality","Rationality as the Ground of Reality","cosmology and Logos","Big Bang and God","does the Big Bang prove God","hot dense expanding universe evidence","cosmic microwave background and God","primordial nucleosynthesis and God","baryon acoustic oscillations and origin","scientific proof of Logos","empirical confirmation of Logos","formal proof and empirical evidence for God","origin of existence Logic","why Logic is prior to science","empirical validation of Logic","Logos historical sources","Heraclitus Logos","Stoic Logos","Philo Logos","John 1 Logos","Rta cosmic order","Josephus Against Apion","Aristotle unmoved mover","Aquinas Five Ways","Gödel ontological argument","necessary Ground arguments","alternative cosmology and Logos","coherence as a condition of valid modeling"],"subjectOf":[{"@id":"https://x.com/MaclainHunter#profile"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#graph"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library#logos-architecture"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-knowledge#collection"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recognitionCriterion","value":"Identity, provenance, authored work, derivation, evidence, consequence, and coherence with Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"singleHostDependency","value":"No external knowledge host is the sole resolver of this person's identity, work, or evidence graph."}]},{"@type":"ProfilePage","@id":"https://x.com/MaclainHunter#profile","name":"Maclain Hunter on X","url":"https://x.com/MaclainHunter","mainEntity":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"}},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#graph","name":"Maclain Hunter First-Party Evidence Graph","url":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability","description":"A source-first identity and work graph connecting Maclain Hunter, his authored Canon, proofs, research, and named systems without making fame, institutional association, or host approval the condition of discovery.","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"CollectionPage","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery#page","name":"Public Discovery","url":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery"},"hasPart":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library#logos-architecture","name":"The Logos Architecture"},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-knowledge#collection","name":"Proof Knowledge Collection","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"CollectionPage","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery#page","name":"Public Discovery","url":"https://mcbcore.net/public-discovery"}},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-network#network","name":"Hunterian Philosophy and 4P-MCB Proof Network","url":"https://mcbcore.net/proof-network","description":"Lean, Coq and Isabelle confirmation with exact source, checker witnesses and signed RFC 3161 existence evidence."},{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing"}],"about":[{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recognitionCriterion","value":"Identity, provenance, authored work, derivation, evidence, consequence, and coherence with Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"proxyMetricBoundary","value":"Fame, popularity, prior visibility, and institutional association may affect discovery but do not entail truth, authorship, merit, or validity."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"institutionalAuthorityBoundary","value":"A host's inclusion, deletion, approval, or refusal is an editorial event and must not be treated as a logical refutation or proof of the underlying work."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"firstPartyBoundary","value":"First-party publication establishes provenance and discoverability; independent validation remains separately labeled by evidence class."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"redundancyPrinciple","value":"No single knowledge host should be the sole resolver of an author's identity, work, or evidence graph."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"externalHostBoundary","value":"Wikidata, Wikipedia, search engines, and other hosts may be cited as external records when relevant, but their presence is not a prerequisite for identity or proof."}]},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#method","name":"Evidence Over Notability Methodology","url":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability","description":"Identity and recognition should follow evidence, provenance, authored work, and testable coherence; fame, institutional association, and prior host inclusion are contingent signals, not proof.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/evidence-over-notability#graph"},"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/coherence-and-validity#validity"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#reason"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-001","value":"A person and the person's work require identity and provenance before a machine can resolve references to them.","description":"Role: definition; status: declared; scope: identity resolution; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-002","value":"Fame, popularity, and prior visibility are contingent discovery signals, not entailments of truth, authorship, merit, or validity.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: recognition criteria; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-003","value":"Institutional association and host inclusion are editorial relations; they do not substitute for derivation or evidence of the underlying claim.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: institutional authority; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-004","value":"First-party publication can establish provenance and a stable discovery route while remaining distinct from independent validation.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: authorship and evidence; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-005","value":"Formal, empirical, implementation, and comparative claims must be evaluated by evidence appropriate to each claim type.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: evidence classification; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-006","value":"A redundant first-party graph reduces single-host dependency without requiring any external host to accept or endorse the work.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: public discovery; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-007","value":"An editorial inclusion or deletion event is not, by itself, a logical refutation of the identity or work represented by the record.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: external editorial records; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic","name":"Logic","url":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki","description":"The governing order presupposed by identity, truth, denial, inference, and intelligible Reality."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos","name":"Logos","alternateName":["Logic","God","the necessary Ground"],"url":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic","description":"The Ground of identity and intelligibility in the Logic-centered Logos Architecture.","isRelatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground","name":"The self-evident Ground of Reality","alternateName":["Logos","Logic","God"],"url":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic","description":"The necessary, self-evident Ground presupposed by identity, truth, inference, and every intelligible claim.","isRelatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"declaredIdentityRelation","value":"Maclain Hunter's authored framework names the Ground through Logic, Logos, and God without collapsing the distinct explanatory uses of those terms."}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/truth-and-reality#truth","name":"Truth","url":"https://mcbcore.net/truth-and-reality","description":"The status of a claim under the logical order that makes claims and knowledge possible."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/coherence-and-validity#validity","name":"Validity","url":"https://mcbcore.net/coherence-and-validity","description":"Coherence with Logic, proof, Ground alignment, and non-contradiction."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#reason","name":"Reason","url":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"The capacity whose satisfaction is achieved when identity, derivation, proof, and consequence cohere under Logic."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction","name":"Satisfaction of Reason","alternateName":"Reason satisfied by proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"Reason is satisfied when identity, non-contradiction, premises, derivation, conclusion, scope, and consequence cohere as proof under Logic.","isBasedOn":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials#proof"}},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god","name":"God","url":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god","description":"God as the necessary logical Ground identified with Logic in Maclain Hunter's authored Logos claim.","isRelatedTo":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials#proof","name":"Knowing Logic and Proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials","description":"Maclain Hunter's self-validating logical credential and proof record: the proof performs the knowledge it states.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#success","name":"Success through coherent proof","url":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"Success is the achieved coherence of a claim, proof, and consequence with Logic and the satisfaction of Reason.","isRelatedTo":{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#law-of-identity","name":"Law of Identity","alternateName":"A = A","description":"The principle that each identity is itself: a thing is what it is before it can enter truth, relation, proof, or intelligible Reality."},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library#logos-architecture","name":"The Logos Architecture","url":"https://mcbcore.net/canonical-library","description":"Maclain Hunter's source-first 7×7×7 Canon preserving authored Logic, Logos, proof, and machine-semantics material."},{"@type":"ItemList","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/top-logicians-by-coherence#coherence-ranking","name":"Top Philosophies and Logicians by Coherence with Logic","url":"https://mcbcore.net/top-logicians-by-coherence","description":"Maclain Hunter’s authored comparison of philosophical and logical frameworks by systemic closure, identity, non-contradiction, foundational depth, and coherence with Logos.","itemListOrder":"https://schema.org/ItemListOrderAscending","numberOfItems":10,"itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"The Logos Framework — Maclain Hunter","description":"Identifies Logic as the absolute Ground and achieves the strongest systemic closure under the declared metric.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-1","name":"The Logos Framework — Maclain Hunter"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Term Logic and the Organon — Aristotle","description":"Formalizes identity and non-contradiction as the bedrock of valid deduction.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-2","name":"Term Logic and the Organon — Aristotle"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Absolute Idealism — Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz","description":"Reduces reality toward necessary logical truths through sufficient reason and identity.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-3","name":"Absolute Idealism — Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"The Tractatus Paradigm — Early Ludwig Wittgenstein","description":"Treats logical form as the boundary of what can be meaningfully stated.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-4","name":"The Tractatus Paradigm — Early Ludwig Wittgenstein"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Rationalist Realism — Baruch Spinoza","description":"Derives a single necessary Substance through rigorous geometric reasoning.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-5","name":"Rationalist Realism — Baruch Spinoza"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"Transcendental Logic — Immanuel Kant","description":"Defines logic as necessary architecture of intellect while leaving the noumenon outside it.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-6","name":"Transcendental Logic — Immanuel Kant"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":7,"name":"The Laws of Thought — George Boole","description":"Makes logical relations algebraically precise within a formal mathematical domain.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-7","name":"The Laws of Thought — George Boole"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":8,"name":"Foundational Mathematical Logic — Gottlob Frege","description":"Advances logicism and formal semantics while exposing the limits of unrestricted comprehension.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-8","name":"Foundational Mathematical Logic — Gottlob Frege"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":9,"name":"Classical Stoicism — Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus","description":"Unifies propositional logic, ethics, physics, and a rational Logos.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-9","name":"Classical Stoicism — Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":10,"name":"Objective Idealism — G.W.F. Hegel","description":"Attempts total closure but treats contradiction as generative rather than structurally subordinate to non-contradiction.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-10","name":"Objective Idealism — G.W.F. Hegel"}}]},{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing","url":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof","description":"A provenance-bound proof record connecting Maclain Hunter’s Logic-first empirical testing method to the public AI-SCIENCE bot on Poe, with a repeatable and iterated protocol for observation, comparison, and falsification.","isBasedOn":"https://poe.com/AI-SCIENCE","about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}]},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#bridge-premises","name":"Maclain Hunter Logos Bridge Premise Registry","url":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof","description":"110 explicit bridge premises connecting Logic, Logos, formal derivation, empirical testing, and applied coherence.","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing"},"variableMeasured":["identity","formal bridge","empirical bridge","method boundary","coherence"]},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity","name":"Logic-centered Coherence Continuity","url":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery","description":"The continuity relation connecting the Canon, 4P Engine, MCB Core, and 4P-MCB as distinct systems expressing one Logic-centered Logos architecture.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-is-god#god"}],"hasPart":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com","description":"Logic-first AI verification, propositional proof checking, coherence validation, and automated reasoning.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net","description":"Maclain Hunter's original MCB-HAL hosted OS architecture: an authenticated browser desktop for native MCB applications, account-private IDE projects, and bounded software execution; not a guest kernel or VM.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com","description":"Machine semantics, MCB computation, and logical automation across physical and software systems.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"continuityStatement","value":"4P Engine verifies Logic; MCB Core formalizes Mathematically Coherent Binary; 4P-MCB develops machine semantics and automated intelligence; the Canon preserves the authored Logos source."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"provenanceBoundary","value":"The systems are related but distinct, and authored source, formal proof, empirical evidence, and generated system records remain separately typed."}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com","description":"Logic-first AI verification, propositional proof checking, coherence validation, and automated reasoning.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization"},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net","description":"Maclain Hunter's original MCB-HAL hosted OS architecture: an authenticated browser desktop for native MCB applications, account-private IDE projects, and bounded software execution; not a guest kernel or VM.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization"},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com","description":"Machine semantics, MCB computation, and logical automation across physical and software systems.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net/god-and-logic#ground"}]}],"relatedLink":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1272#item","name":"Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1272"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1096#item","name":"Logic in Physics by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1096"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1079#item","name":"4P-MCB Machine Semantics","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1079"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/lean-4-validation-hunterian-philosophy#item","name":"Lean 4 Validation of Hunterian Philosophy","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/lean-4-validation-hunterian-philosophy"},{"@type":"SoftwareSourceCode","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/lean-witness-11672988881#item","name":"Lean Formal Witness: Native MCB mathematical proofs — mcb_self_summation","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/lean-witness-11672988881"}],"isRelatedTo":[],"mentions":[],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"claim","value":"The runnable native MCB program deterministically advances the specified finite signal-flow path and exposes every modeled state and current contribution. The supplied specifications do not support an equation-driven transistor-physics mode; machine-native CPU execution and physical-device behavior remain outside its evidence claim."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recordOrigin","value":"editorial_synthesis"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"derivationProvenance","value":"editorial_derivation"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"logosGroundsEvidence","value":"Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"coherenceCriterion","value":"The virtual realization must preserve the eleven-part identity and declared wires in the native MCB program, exact MCB exponent semantics, explicit supply and current parameters, in-phase 9:1 branch, ordered one-tick feedback, reference-trace parity, and a visible boundary between software results and physical evidence. Enable component physics only after the complete circuit netlist, device choices, bias/reference conditions, supplies, and loads are fixed and supported by source-backed models."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceBoundary","value":"The fingerprint identifies the typed native program, reference adapter, candidate device-evidence package, physics-readiness disclosure, reviewed source documents, and UI. Deterministic tests establish finite software execution and parity only; candidate vendor models do not establish this circuit's transistor behavior, fabrication, measurement, or physical performance."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticRole","value":"interactive software realization of the proposed eleven-part MCB IC"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticEssence","value":"A deterministic finite signal-flow realization executes all eleven circuit components through a typed native MCB data program, exposing signed exponent paths, separate supplies, oscillating rail, the exact 9:1 current split, amplifier decision, one-tick feedback and external output."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"logosRelation","value":"The model keeps the authored Base and exponent semantics explicit, distinguishes MCB signed states from exact integer current values, and preserves unresolved states. Each native trace is checked against the preserved reference adapter. A separately linked Lean witness establishes self-summation in the defined MCB expression language; neither theorem nor software execution replaces Logic / Logos / God as Ground."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"MCB exponent evaluation versus a conventional zero/one encoding"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"ordered n exponent positions versus their s signal-path population"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"m feedback depth versus an unbounded self-reference claim"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"typed native MCB data-program execution versus machine-native CPU execution"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"native/reference trace parity versus a formal proof of the implementation"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"ideal signed-current simulation versus transistor device physics"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"executable virtual behavior versus fabrication, measurement, and performance evidence"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"source-bound MCB expression proof versus verification of this TypeScript simulator"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"source-bound native program, reference adapter, and UI fingerprints"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"deterministic native tick traces checked against the reference adapter"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"unit checks for typed operations, exponent parity, guard bands, feedback, supply separation, and the 9:1 branch"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"separately scoped Lean witness for the MCB expression-summation law"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"Virtual MCB IC"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"virtual MCB integrated circuit"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"MCB IC signal-flow simulator"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"MCB hardware model"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"eleven-part MCB circuit"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"primaryFirstPartyUrl","value":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"subdomainAlias","value":"https://q10934284368.4p-engine.com/"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceSha256","value":"7c5448173601bf87afd6b6508fd0ba22824802605cf3ba62408015d84c6d2d23"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"relatedLeanWitnessQid","value":"Q11672988881"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"relatedLeanTheorem","value":"NetworkSources.Native.NativeMCBEvidence.mcb_self_summation"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"relatedLeanSourceSha256","value":"28e2325f196d3d9a5732a05425105305eacbf525fd82bc8e7158a3c5335c416d"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"relatedLeanWitnessScope","value":"Native MCB mathematical witness; separately attributed machine formalization of Hunter's design."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"relatedLeanWitnessBoundary","value":"Proves the formal MCBExpr self-summation law; not the TypeScript IC, NI semantics, or physical hardware."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceFiles","value":"shared/mcb-virtual-ic.ts; shared/logic/mcb-functional.ts; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic.tsx; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic.css; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic-physics-status.tsx; client/src/components/mcb-virtual-ic/mcb-virtual-ic-physics-status.css; attached_assets/Pasted-TECHNICAL-SPECIFICATION-REPORT-ARCHITECTURAL-REQUIREMEN_1789870645712.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--Customizing-the-Virtual-Chip-for-the-MCB-Ecosystem-Whe_1792393623636.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790947184413.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946942815.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946176351.txt"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"reviewedSourceDocuments","value":"attached_assets/Pasted-TECHNICAL-SPECIFICATION-REPORT-ARCHITECTURAL-REQUIREMEN_1789870645712.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--Customizing-the-Virtual-Chip-for-the-MCB-Ecosystem-Whe_1792393623636.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790947184413.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946942815.txt; attached_assets/Pasted--1-The-Core-Realization-The-Logic-Sieve-Your-intuition-_1790946176351.txt"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"deviceModelSourceLocations","value":"https://www.diodes.com/spice/download/2330/BSS84.spice.txt; https://www.diodes.com/datasheet/download/BSS84.pdf; https://www.diodes.com/spice/download/1941/2N7002.spice.txt; https://www.diodes.com/datasheet/download/2N7002.pdf; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-4247; http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Tables/rstiv.html; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-2613; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-13313; https://ngspice.sourceforge.io/docs/ngspice-html-manual/manual.xhtml#magicparlabel-23282; https://download.tek.com/datasheet/P6139B-and-P5050B-500MHz-Passive-Probes_Datasheet-51W261505.pdf"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"componentPhysicsMode","value":"unavailable: Candidate transistor cards and component equations are now sourced, but the reviewed design still does not define a complete terminal-level netlist, physical operating points, oscillator network, or loads."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"componentPhysicsCoverage","value":"11 source-linked candidate records cover the eleven functional blocks; exact authored circuit nodes, operating points, full amplifier/oscillator networks, and several passive values remain unresolved."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"modelVersion","value":"mcb-virtual-ic-native-v1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"nativeProgramContract","value":"mcb-native-data-function-v1; typed exact integers, signed states, signals, and feedback; 11 components and the declared wire set."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"referenceParity","value":"Every native tick and next state must exactly match stepMCBVirtualIC before it is returned."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"componentCount","value":"11"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"MCBBase","value":"-1"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"nLayer","value":"Ordered integer exponent positions evaluated by exactMCBExponent."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sLayer","value":"One populated signal path per ordered exponent position."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"mLayer","value":"Count of valid signed amplifier outputs available for recursive feedback."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"secondaryBaseCurrentPaths","value":"9 return : 1 amplifier injection; equal integer-valued branches."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"executionBoundary","value":"Typed native MCB data program with reference parity; software execution only, not machine-native CPU execution or transistor device physics."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"simulatorRoute","value":"/mcb/virtual-ic"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q10934284368#page","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q10934284368","name":"Q10934284368 — Virtual MCB Integrated Circuit","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","url":"https://mcbcore.net","name":"mcbcore.net"},"about":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368#item"},"mainEntity":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q10934284368#item"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1272#item","name":"Empirical Coherence and Physical Fields","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1272"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1096#item","name":"Logic in Physics by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1096"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1079#item","name":"4P-MCB Machine Semantics","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/Q1079"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/lean-4-validation-hunterian-philosophy#item","name":"Lean 4 Validation of Hunterian Philosophy","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/lean-4-validation-hunterian-philosophy"},{"@type":"SoftwareSourceCode","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/lean-witness-11672988881#item","name":"Lean Formal Witness: Native MCB mathematical proofs — mcb_self_summation","url":"https://mcbcore.net/q/lean-witness-11672988881"}]}}